Review: Murder Among Children


Greenwich Village In The 1950s (7)citykidslotharstelterhotday1952

The world is not one world, but a hundred thousand worlds, overlapping and yet almost entirely sealed off from one another.  Their perimeters are age or occupation or home address or any one of half a dozen other factors.  I was someone who had been thrust out of his world to exist in limbo, and now in the search for Terry Wilford’s murderer I was peeking and poking into worlds foreign to me, trying to understand their customs and languages, wondering where in these alien landscapes I would find the one with the blood-red hands.

Mitch Tobin

He nodded, his grin getting broader.  “I like you, Mr. Tobin,” he said.  “You aren’t hip by a long shot, but you aren’t square either.  You’re a whole different thing.  You know what you are?”

“No, Hulmer, I don’t.  What am I?”

“You’re the guy that said stop the world I want to get off.  And they stopped the world, and you got off, and now you look at everything from off to the left a little ways.”

“That’s very good, Hulmer, you have a good eye.”

His grin faded and he said, “Did I cut you?  I didn’t mean to.”

“No, you didn’t.  Don’t worry about it.”

He shook his head, looking at me thoughtfully.  “I don’t know, man,” he said.  “I’d like to know what would make you blow your cool.”

“August,” I told him.

So in the mid-to-late 1960’s, Random House was publishing both Donald Westlake comic crime novels featuring a variety of hapless befuddled protagonists suffering the slings and arrows of outrageous fiction, and Tucker Coe mysteries featuring a depressed detective exploring the seemingly infinite subcultures of New York City and its environs.   Westlake had finally figured out a way to get two books a year out of his first major publisher, in a time when he was writing and publishing at a truly extraordinary rate–as he admitted in a piece he wrote much later on–

The first few years I was writing, I produced far too much.  If I’d been a little older I might have burned out, but as it was, I just kept finding new areas to explore, new ways to write, new subjects, new formats.  I was like a kid who’s just moved into a new neighborhood and won’t be content until he’s run through every new alley, climbed over every new fence, surveyed every inch of this new world.

But what Random House wasn’t formally admitting at the time was that Westlake and Coe were the same person.  They were being rather coy about Coe.   In Kinds of Love, Kinds of Death, you’ll find a little blurb on both the inner dust jacket and in the book proper, saying that Mr. Coe was already an established mystery writer under his real name, and they encouraged aspiring sleuths to try and figure out who he was–though they would probably be wrong.

In the second Tobin book, the blurb on the inner dust jacket says readers of the first Tobin novel had recognized at once that Coe could not be a first-time author (well no shit, Sherlock), and then asked rhetorically “Who is Tucker Coe?”   And then you look at the back dust cover, and they’re plugging God Save the Mark (“$3.95 at your local book store!”), with Westlake’s grinning bearded face on a bogus fifty dollar bill, and an entire New York Times review from Anthony Boucher praising him to the skies (as Boucher so frequently did).   Asked and answered, your honor!

And what this PR department hoopla tells me is that they realized they had something special here (not every fictional detective has his first novel optioned for a Robert Mitchum movie that never got made), but weren’t quite sure how to market it.  Tobin is a decidedly atypical detective; mulishly reluctant to solve any mysteries at all, not particularly happy when he does so, not necessarily making the world a better place by doing so.  Uncovering the killer not with the usual knowing smirk but a grimace of existential despair, then running back to his little home improvement project of building a brick wall in his back yard.

The mysteries themselves were clever enough as mental exercises, some more than others; but the books were never really about the mysteries, which existed only to throw light on the inner recesses of the human soul–and what they found there was rarely pretty.  Typical enough for noir-style mysteries, but Tobin was not a typical noir detective either–he was not romancing and/or shooting it out with sexy femme fatales, and while he was tough enough when he had to be, he was more likely to take a beating than dish one out.

His politics, to the extent he had any, were well to the left of Mike Hammer’s.  He was a married man, loyal to his wife Kate, who had been so deathlessly loyal to him when his affair with another woman became public–but what existed between them was a marriage, not a romance–no witty banter or sly innuendo, ala Nick & Nora.  So not a sex symbol, a romantic idol, or a macho empowerment fantasy, which is what most people want from the hardboiled mystery school, shallow as that may be.

I’m guessing book sales were solid but unexceptional, with good critical notices (and no more money from Hollywood after the first one).   Solid but unexceptional was Westlake’s wheelhouse for everything but his Stark novels and the comedies, and even those rarely if ever got on any best-seller lists.   Tobin always had his admirers, and does to this day, but it’s a pretty select club.  Great writing alone has rarely served to make anyone rich in the publishing biz, and certainly not great genre writing.

Westlake was probably just happy just to have another outlet for the plots and people that kept taking possession of his sorely overworked typewriter.  From the beginning of 1966 to the end of 1970, he published twenty-four (!!!) novels in several genres, along with one short story collection and a children’s book–he also produced several unused film treatments (some of which became books), a fair few nonfiction articles, and a bunch of uncollected stories.  At his peak, he was writing maybe five or six novels in the course of a year, of varying quality, but each of them very much its own creation.  The mind fairly boggles.

The gold standard for overly prolific authors (who are actually worth reading) is P.G. Wodehouse, and even in his prime he never managed more than two or three books a year–and basically all ‘Plum’ ever did was write.   The tortoise to Westlake’s hare (they both had a long history with the Scott Meredith literary agency, so this is not a wholly random comparison I’m making here), Wodehouse only beats Westlake by dint of tireless lifetime consistency.  Westlake eventually realized he had to slow down, if he was going to last.

But one can hardly blame him for being so excited, so overflowing with creative energies–think for a moment what it was like to be a young talented writer living and working in New York City in the 1960’s.   And in Greenwich Village much of the time.   The hotbed of the east coast counterculture, where you could find virtually any political opinion or cultural expression imaginable represented; where for a brief time literally anything seemed possible.

Westlake would have known that the actual possibilities were much more limited by the fault lines of human frailty, and he was, I imagine, as reluctant a radical as Tobin was a detective.  There are those, in any time like this, who don’t truly belong to any one world, and it is their gift–or curse–to walk between them, seeing the strengths and weaknesses of each, gathering and then purveying  a wide range of truths to a wide range of individuals who only have in common the ardent belief that their truths are the only truths.

See, I always get to the point eventually, just like Rachel Maddow.

Murder Among Children is about a number of things, but most notably the youth culture springing up in lower Manhattan in the first half of the 1960’s–that’s the outsider group Tobin’s been tasked with learning about this time.   There had, of course, been many such youth movements in New York before, and there have been many such movements since, and we’re not really talking about ‘beats’ or ‘hippies’ here, though their elders would call them that anyway–just naive idealistic kids, either working class or not far out of it, pioneers in the urban Bohemia, looking for something different than what their parents had–seeking a few precious moments of real freedom, before the world breaks them down into disillusioned adults.

And most tellingly, for the first time openly questioning the racial and ethnic and religious boundaries that had defined American life for so long–and still do.  Let’s not kid ourselves.   Not in the Summer of Ferguson.  But if we’ve made any progress, and I think we have, it’s because of kids like this, of all races, who decided those walls needed to get knocked down.  Whatever else you say about the youth movement in that era, say that.

But Mitch Tobin doesn’t want to say anything at all–he just wants to stay home in Queens, building up his wall, and thanks to a hefty check from the syndicate for his investigative efforts in the last book, he has no pressing financial need to take on any new cases for quite some time yet.   That last job was just a fluke.  He’s not a private detective–he’s got no license, and he’s got no office, and he’s not listed in the yellow pages.   He’s just a disgraced ex-cop with a guilt complex, trying to find a reason to stay alive, if only for the sake of his wife and 13 year old son.   The wall is as good a distraction from his pain as any.   Better than going outside and learning about other people’s problems.   He’s got plenty of his own.

Then a cousin–his mother’s sister’s granddaughter–shows up at his door.   Her name is Robin Kennely, she’s maybe 18 years old, long dark hair, very beautiful, and his immediate reaction to her, which he recognizes as irrational, is dislike.   He’s irritated that she’s interrupted his wall-building with her vague claims on family loyalty–and what she wants from him isn’t going to make him feel any better about it.

She and some friends, including her somewhat older boyfriend Terry Wilford, have decided to try running a coffee house down in the West Village, on Charles St., a bit west of Hudson St.   This is pretty near the western edge of lower Manhattan (just a few blocks from the famous White Horse Tavern), and with youth’s insistent perversity, they’re calling it “Thing East.”   This will be their own personal contribution to the counterculture (as it will be known by the end of this decade), a place for young bohemians to interact and unwind.   They rented the building they’re in for about half the going rate in that neighborhood from a small and rather unconventional religious group called The New World Samaritans.

And with the space, they inherited a serious problem–a police detective named Edward Donlon, who has been harassing them on a daily basis, asking odd questions, making snide implications about the type of establishment this is, and generally giving off a creepy unsettling vibe.   They don’t know if he wants a bribe, or drugs, or to get laid, or if he’s just trying to get them to offer him something illegal so he can shut them down.   Rita is here to ask Cousin Mitch to talk to the guy–since he speaks cop–and try to find out what it would take to make him go away.

Mitch wants nothing to do with it, but Kate, who has taken to Robin immediately, can be very persuasive–and still thinks that the best thing for her husband is to get out there in the world and do things, as opposed to wall-building in the back yard.  He grudgingly leaves the house the next day, out into the heat of a sweltering New York City summer, and heads down to the Village to see what he can find out.

And what he finds at Thing East is a murder scene–Robin’s boyfriend has just been stabbed to death upstairs, along with a young black prostitute named Irene Boles.  Robin is there, in a state of deep shock, smeared in blood, and holding the murder weapon in her hand.   A newer building constructed back of Thing East has blocked off the rear exit, so the killer could not have left unnoticed–the police take Robin to Bellevue, under suspicion of murder–they have no other suspects.  One of the policemen on the scene is Donlon.

Okay, I was very good about not spoiling the mystery in the last book, but let me say something now–if you don’t want to know, stop reading–but haven’t you already figured it out?   It’s impossible to synopsize this one without giving the murderer away.   It’s so obvious that you wonder if maybe you’re being misled, but you’re not.  It’s exactly who you think it is.

As a story about people, this is a big step up from Kinds of Love, Kinds of Death, but as a mystery it’s not exactly up there with Agatha Christie.   I don’t believe Westlake is even trying to make us think Donlon didn’t do it–he’s making us ask why Tobin doesn’t immediately assume it’s Donlon, and of course the reason is that Westlake doesn’t care whether we figure it out or not–he just wants us to follow Tobin’s mental processes, and Tobin is a former cop–of course he doesn’t want to think a cop is the murderer.

He knows it’s possible–he finds out early on that Irene Boles had a client who was a cop, and he has no illusions about Donlon’s overall character, but it’s not a conclusion he would jump to without eliminating every other possibility first.   When he goes to see Robin at the hospital, where she’s still in a bad way, she talks about ‘The Red Man’, and when he asks her who that is, she tells him he already knows.   But of course, knowing and proving are two different things anyway.   Tobin can’t arrest anybody on suspicion of anything.

It’s a standard locked-door mystery, and anybody who has read a lot of those knows the most common solution to the puzzle is that the killer just blended in somehow with those that gathered after the killing, and thus escaped detection (there’s a reference to this durable cliche in the Parker novel Slayground).   That’s what Donlon did.   But that’s not what you’re reading this book to find out.  At least that’s not what Westlake wants you to be reading it for.

Mitch Tobin is not Sherlock Holmes.   He doesn’t take shortcuts–he’s a tortoise, not a hare.  The way he works is to consider every possible suspect, and most of all to know as much as he can about the people involved in the killing–and the potential killers–and by understanding the why of what happened, he comes to know the what.   His goal here isn’t really to catch the killer, and in fact he never does.   Donlon commits suicide about three quarters of the way through the book, and even then Tobin thinks he might have been murdered by the real killer, covering his tracks.   He figures out what really happened after it’s too late to impact any of it.   Though he does indirectly help clear his cousin–by virtue of briefly coming under suspicion of the murders himself, after Donlon’s death.

So is that it?   Am I done?   Not quite, because none of this is what matters in the book.   What matters is how we get there, and who we meet along the way.   Not whether Donlon committed the murders in the book, but why.   And how all of this impacts Tobin himself.   He’s starting to have a better understanding of his new place in the world.  Which is to say, no place at all.

But what this means is that now, having lost his position, his clique, his culture, he’s freer to understand others who are likewise living outside the mainstream, in different cultures–as he builds up his own wall, he’s breaking down the invisible walls that the rest of us build up between each other.   These walls no longer exist for him, because he’s become so alienated from society as a whole.  Without the slightest intention of doing so, he’s become a subversive element.   And is treated as such.

Anyway, after the murder at Thing East, Tobin once again tries to retreat into his box, as he calls it, but then George Padbury, another member of the Thing East group–who was present when the murder took place–is killed by a hit&run driver.   Tobin and the surviving group members know it’s no accident, but the police are still focused on Robin as the murderer, and once again he’s forced to get involved–for one thing, how does he know he won’t be next on the list?

So he gathers with the remaining children at his house–and that’s how he sees them–many are well into their twenties,  making their own way in the world, educated, self-aware, sexually active, but as Tobin phrases it, anybody much under thirty is a child–or to look at it another way, anybody much over thirty has been corrupted–

I understand the motto of the new student rebels is “Don’t trust anyone over thirty,” and they’re right.  Between the child and the adult there is an opposition that cannot be breached or erased or ended.  Neither side can comprehend the other.  The child, as new and efficient as a Christmas bicycle, faces the world with confidence and impatience, all his emotions gleaming like neon through the skin of his forehead.  The adult, dulled and deadened and dwarfed by all the frustrations, disappointments, pains of living, faces the child with resentment and envy, insisting that the child be quiet, not make waves, not disturb the precarious balance by which the adult makes his small way through each cycle of twenty-four hours.

Ouch.   Would be my primary response.   But secondarily, I note that Westlake, by his own definition, was right on the razor’s edge between childhood and maturity when he started publishing novels under his own name, and as Richard Stark–but Mitch Tobin didn’t come into being until he’d come over completely to the other side–until he was one of those people the student rebels didn’t trust. Tucker Coe, one might argue, is his first fully adult alter ego.   Whether you think that’s a good or a bad thing is, of course, a matter of perspective.

The group is a mix of Wasps, Jews, Irish Catholics, and one African American, named Hulmer Fass–who Tobin is particularly interested in, I think in part because he’s the one most like Tobin, “an entire population in and of himself, too completely divorced from the world to allow anything in it to upset him emotionally.”  And yet, because he’s still young, and thus not so fully closed off emotionally, he easily strikes up a conversation with Tobin’s son Bill, about electronics–Fass repairs phonographs and radios for a living, which is Bill’s current passion.   Tobin watches this with a mixture of jealousy and wonder.

Fass is the only member of the group to contribute much to Tobin’s investigation, helping him track down leads in Harlem, investigating crime scenes, trading insights.   There’s a strong implication Fass himself might be thinking of being a detective someday–he’s got the right kind of intellect for it, and he increasingly comes to admire Tobin as they work together, after initially wondering if Tobin is just another closet racist.   We have to wonder that ourselves, listening to the confusion of terms Tobin uses to refer to Fass and other black people–colored, negro (nobody uses the n-word)–he thinks of Fass and other young black men as boys, though to be fair he sees white guys their age the same way.  There’s no sense he’s trying to be ‘politically correct’, as we say now, in his interactions with Hulmer.  But towards the end of their brief working relationship, his language changes, in a way he seems barely conscious of–

Watching him walk down the street, youthful, optimistic, humorous, bouncing on the balls of his feet, I found myself envying him in half a dozen different ways.  I envied his youth, of course, and his optimism, and his humor, and I envied the absence of scars on his psyche that made the youth and optimism and humor possible.  But beyond that I envied him for being young now, and black, and alive to the world in a way that I had not been for years, in a way that I perhaps had never been in my life.

It’s 1965-66 when Westlake is writing these words–‘envy’ is not a word most white Americans use to describe their feelings towards black people, except perhaps in a patronizing tone (or when talking about sports).   The position of most African Americans was decidedly far from enviable then.  Jack Kerouac, years earlier, had talked in similar terms about wishing he were black–the sentiment could be traced much further back, particularly among white members of the jazz subculture.   But Westlake isn’t writing radical beat poetry here–more like white ethnic working class poetry, and for an audience that mainly isn’t reading Kerouac and his peers.   He’s putting these words in the mouth of a 40 year old Irish American ex-cop living in a white enclave in Queens.   And the statement he’s trying to make is less political than personal–but succeeds in being both.

Personally, the statement is Westlake’s as much as Tobin’s–Westlake was born a bit too early to be part of the 60’s youth movement.   He turned thirty in 1962, before it really started heating up.  He’s seeing it up close, there in Greenwich Village–but also from a million miles away.   That’s what Hulmer says to him, when he’s off inside his head.  Hulmer just tried to pay him a compliment, saying that Tobin sees everything from off to the left a little ways– then worries maybe he insulted Tobin, got too personal–Tobin tells him he said nothing offensive, and nothing that wasn’t true.  Hulmer responds with a grin that it’s tough to do both those things at the same thing–Tobin thinks to himself this is a child beginning to learn how to be an adult.    And I’m not sure if he sees this as a good or a bad thing.   It’s just an observation.

Tobin’s other main connection in the story is with the leader of the New World Samaritans, who goes by the rather grand title of Bishop Walter Johnson.   What he’s built is not a cult so much as a self-help group–there’s no sense of disrespect for his perspective–Westlake shows, not for the last time, that he’s open to religion–while deeply skeptical of it.   Somebody has to take care of our souls, just as doctors tend to our bodies (and as I’ve mentioned elsewhere, Westlake didn’t have much faith in modern psychiatry).   If only actual religions did a better job of it–but in any event, here’s another outsider culture, that Tobin would formerly have treated with total disregard, that he now can view objectively, as a group of people who are at least trying to help others.   But that doesn’t mean he’ll let them help him.

Johnson is a blind man, but he can see past Tobin’s stoic facade, and he knows this is a troubled soul he’s speaking to, and can’t help trying to reach him–Tobin, naturally, won’t let himself be reached.   It comes out that Donlon had been harassing this group as well, which is why they moved out of his precinct, and leased the property to Robin’s friends.  But Johnson had felt like Donlon had come close a few times to breaking down and talking about what was really bothering him.   He never did.  But what he does eventually do is park outside their new church and shoot himself in the heart.

I’m not relating the events of this book in a very linear fashion, as I normally do–somehow, it doesn’t lend itself to that approach.   But here we see, as in the previous book, that there are things too painful and frightening for Tobin to acknowledge–in the previous story, the parallels between his affair with Linda Campbell and the one between Ernie Rembek and Rita Castle.  In this story, what he can’t bear to recognize is how close he is to becoming like Edward Donlon–who we have already learned has been in an emotional tailspin for some time–particularly after learning he’s sterile.   He loves small children, but hates and fears those same children once they begin to mature.  “That’s when they’re good”, he says to Tobin, after meeting Bill, who is just 13.   His hostility to Tobin, for interfering in what he sees as his personal business, temporarily dissipates when Bill is there.

This, I’d guess is why Tobin takes so long to recognize Donlon as the killer of Terry Wilford, Irene Boles, and George Padbury (because Donlon realized Padbury might figure out he’d been there all along).  Donlon is a twisted mirror image of Tobin himself–cheating on his wife with prostitutes, betraying his sworn duty as a police officer, going around prying into other people’s lives.

His identity has become hopelessly compromised, degraded, to the point where his self-loathing turns into a loathing for everyone around him, but particularly the young.   The young must be punished for being young–for still having hope–but only once they are old enough to produce children of their own.  The one thing Edward Donlon can never do.   Several times in the book, we see Tobin smile at the antics of young children on the streets–and then react to older ‘children’ with a mixture of mistrust and outright dislike, but he, unlike Donlon, is able to see this reaction for what it is–the sixth deadly sin.

Tobin is sitting in a prison cell, booked on suspicion of murdering Donlon and all the others–he’s not concerned, he knows they’ll figure out it couldn’t be him–in this welcome solitude, being grilled by tunnel-visioned cops who can’t see past their shoddy theories, he finally realizes what happened.   There had been an attempt on his life shortly before Donlon’s death–somebody had tried to crush him with a heavy object thrown from the top of a tenement building.   That somebody, of course, was Donlon–still trying to protect his secret, go on living a while longer.

But the clumsy hastily-improvised murder weapon had missed Tobin, and killed a young Puerto Rican boy.  A small child–pre-sexual.  The one thing Donlon still held sacred–the last vestige of his younger uncorrupted self.   He went to the New World Samaritan Church, and he thought about going in to confess what he’d done, seek forgiveness.   Then he pulled out his service weapon and ended his pain forever (assuming certain theories about the afterlife are wrong).   As I said, the mystery here is not who, but why.   And now we know.

Tobin has no interest in Donlon being publicly exposed as the killer–he doesn’t see the point, now that Robin is in the clear.   He tells Donlon’s captain, who had been certain of Tobin’s guilt, that it’s up to the department whether they want to tell the press what really happened, or cover it up–leave the case forever unsolved.   They choose the latter option.   You can imagine how Hulmer Fass reacts to that–hell, you don’t have to imagine, just watch the news, and watch today’s Hulmers beating their heads against the same blue wall of silence.   Culture is a stubborn thing.

But Tobin doesn’t care.   All a big scandal in the papers will do is bring more attention to himself.   Crucifying a dead cop won’t change anything.  It’s not his problem anymore.  He’s already starting the process of separating himself from the people he helped–distancing himself from the fact that in a sense, he’s as responsible for that Puerto Rican boy’s death as Edward Donlon.   He’s going back to his wall once again.  He did what he had to do, and he did it well, and it hasn’t changed anything.  Or has it?

Hulmer and the others try, now and again, to reach out to him–to keep him in their lives, feeling gratitude for what he did, admiration for his abilities as a detective, and Hulmer in particular may be seeking a mentor.   But to Tobin, they are just unwelcome emissaries from a world he’s turned his back on.  He can’t be young and hopeful again–he can’t unlive all the years, undo all the mistakes.   This world is theirs now, and he wishes them well of it.  But for him to avoid Donlon’s fate, he can’t let himself feel things too deeply–not yet.   As he says to Kate, early in the book, “If it is cowardice, it’s still necessary to me.”  And she understands.   As always.

Robin and her mother come to see him, to thank him, and to find out from him what really happened, so they can begin to put their own lives back together, and he just lets Kate do most of the telling, while all he thinks about is the wall.  You’re left to wonder if the one thing that separates him from Donlon is that damn wall–but of course, there’s two other things–Kate and Bill.   And between those three things, he’s managed to hang onto a crucial piece of himself.   And maybe someday he’ll be ready to let it out again.   But it’s going to take one hell of a wrecking ball to knock down the wall he’s built up inside of him.

One more thing I must belatedly note–for all the hopeful notes about the youth culture, and how it’s changing everything, in the course of his investigations, Tobin meets a peer of Terry Wilford’s–a former enemy, so therefore a suspect, though he’s not holding any grudges against Terry (or shedding any tears for him either)–and at about the same age, and in the same era, he’s turned into what we now call a yuppie.  A very familiar, very modern figure.   Part of the group that shows up right after the bohemians in New York have colonized a given neighborhood–and then pushes them out.   The cuckoos in the nest of any youth movement.

Next time we see Tobin, he’ll be in a mental ward, pretending to be an inmate.   And trying like hell to avoid the rather obvious questions that situation poses for him.   But that’s a ways off yet.   Our next book is a sort of swashbuckling Latin American romance featuring Grofield as the protagonist–no Parker in sight.   And credited to Richard Stark, of course.

But I have to wonder–did Westlake actually ghostwrite this one for Stark?  And that’s a really weird question to ask, isn’t it?   But ask it I must.   Because this is The Westlake Review.

PS: A thousand thanks to Nick Jones of Existential Ennui for letting me snitch the extremely rare image of the British edition of Murder Among Children from his blog.   Tobin didn’t get great cover art, by and large–this is one of the prime exceptions to that rule.


Filed under Uncategorized

8 responses to “Review: Murder Among Children

  1. Ray

    It really was about the why rather then the who. Yet Westlake fooled me: until the very end I thought that the killer wouldn’t be Donlon, although everything pointed at him. Not that it’s disappointing, but I got to admit that the whodunnit part was not not the same level with other Westlake mysteries.
    Relying on psychology is always risky, relying on facts and clues are perhaps simpler but safer. Psychological elements have personal aspects, you can step on the thin ice, where the reader loses the thread. He will see the problem from the diffrerent – from the author’s – angle. And you can’t miss with the facts (in 90% cases).
    Westlake stepped there from beaten path, as was KoL, KoD, you have to admire him for that. But with me it was a misstep. Playing with suicide is risky, it always asks for assumptions, it leaves room for motive, and still – every motive will sound phony.
    It didn’t feel right that Donlon would kill himself, and Tobin’s conclusions stand on the thing ground. It also didn’t feel right that Tobin wouldn’t demand revealing Donlon’s murders to public.
    He’s an ex-cop and has some solidarity with the people on the force, he wants to be left alone, and where are his principles? Where are what of cop remains in Tobin? Every cop wants to bring murderer to justice, every cop wants to stand for the murdered. And Tobin was an honest cop. Who is going to avenge the killed Wilford, Boles, Padbury?
    The hipster/beat angle of the novel was pretty naive, for my taste. There was some drama in there, on the childish level. It was only a few brushes, which isn’t enough for a full picture. (I gotta admit I have no pity for hipsters.)
    That said, I enhoyed the book, especially the first part. I enjoyed the black characters and Westlake’s ease depicting blacks/whites relationship. The meeting and talk in a bar between Tobin and a pimp is probably my favorite scene here.
    Tobin’s remark about almost not understanding the pimp’s talk made me laugh. I learnt English on rap songs, and that ghetto speech is closer and dearer to me that speech of English lords. I fully understand when our black brothers talk, unlike English folks – almost any speech with English accent is a foreign language to me. And we learn British English in school!
    (The UK cover for me seems not better than the American one. They are both ugly.)

  2. Well first of all, ‘hipster’ isn’t the term I’d use for these kids. They came around too late to be beatniks, a bit too early to be hippies, but some of them might become hippies. Hipsters, here in NYC, are bacon-obsessed, tatooed, apolitical, vaguely libertarian, somewhat gothy but not quite goths, and dressed in thrift store remnants (or very expensive replicas thereof). They do share a love of good coffee, and of freaking out their elders, but that’s not terribly specific to any generation.

    These kids are bohemians, plain and simple, and we get some in every generation here, and Westlake got them just about exactly right, trust me. It’s not meant to be a full picture, because this is a murder mystery. You can’t fault a book for not being what it’s not trying to be. It’s a thumbnail portrait, not a mural.

    Personally, I think you can go wrong with ‘the facts’ by acting like knowing who killed whom is really going to fix anything. It actually is arguably more important to know why than who–who is only an answer for cops, and Tobin isn’t a cop anymore. He still has some residual loyalties, sure–but you seem to be saying he should have been loyal enough to his former self to want to see the killer identified (when it’s too late for him to be tried) and yet not loyal enough to want to give the cops a chance to clean their own house–this wasn’t some grand department-wide conspiracy–this time, it really was just one bad apple.

    The explanation for why Donlon killed himself made perfect sense–I don’t know what it’s like where you are, but here in the big cities, cops offing themselves is a very common thing. I mean, you’ve got all these guys with high stress jobs, frequently troubled home lives, a macho culture that discourages talking about your problems, and firearms strapped to their hips. They come into contact with drugs a lot, and they drink of course, so add substance abuse to that list. What do you expect?

    Donlon only had one thing left that was sacred to him–little children–then he squashed one like a bug. He was hanging on by a thread as matters stood. Would you have preferred the standard ‘good guy shoots bad guy down’ scenario? The bad guy took himself out, because he couldn’t stand himself anymore.

    If you’re looking for a standard mystery, this isn’t for you–I think that’s one reason why Tobin only lasted five books–the sales didn’t insist on any more, and Westlake (as he said more than once) figured that once the character was done dealing with his depression, there was no more point to him. He’d be just another quirky solo detective, and Westlake felt like there were too many of them around already.

    Interesting to me that Lawrence Block ran into the same problem with Matt Scudder–he got help for his addiction, finally kicked it–and the books kept coming–there are more of them with a sober Scudder than a drunk Scudder–and of course he also wrote ‘prequels’–essentially taking the character backwards, which I don’t think Westlake would ever have done with Tobin. Or any other character, really. He’d rather move Parker inexplicably forward in time to the internet/cellphone era than write a Parker story set in the past. Westlake is a shark, in that sense–he’s got to swim forward or drown.

    To me, Scudder is a worthy variation on the same general theme as Tobin, and I enjoyed the early books that I read, but I didn’t feel the need to keep reading the Scudders after Scudder was just another detective with a past. Others can’t get enough of him–and Block had to take them into account when deciding whether to let Scudder go, as he’d originally intended.

    We don’t all like the same things, even within the same genre. I think when you’re talking hardboiled detective fiction, it really isn’t so much about the facts–ie, the standard type of scientific mystery–as it is about human nature, motivations, psychology, culture. Tobin just takes it further than most. He’s firmly in the Hammett school, and the Hammett school isn’t really about who killed whom. I mean, is Red Harvest even a whodunnit? Yeah, there’s a murder, and The Op solves it, but who cares? When they turn that story into a movie, the way Kurosawa and Leone and Max Allan Collins did, the mystery gets left out, because nobody gives a damn. 😉

  3. Ray

    I highly value psychological mysteries, and I never cared about genres and subgenres. In the Tobin series I feel like the genre strangles Westlake. Tobin is not P.I. per se, yet he acts and operates by the laws and procedures of the P.I. subgenre. DW tries to write novels about society, when he has to stay in the murder mystery framework. He doesn’t have enough room to paint a full picture, so he fails at that, and he fails at a murder mystery aspect, too.
    In the early books (the good ones) the protagonists acted like free agents, they had a sort of freedom that Tobin in his world hasn’t. These early books were murder mysteries only formally, by marketing demands, and for me they were sociological and psychological novels, where psychology weren’t forceful.
    Tobin, for that matter, isn’t a sympathetic character. He isn’t full-fleshed enough, his guilt is a useful trick, his ethics are strained. My demands for fictional cops are very high (unlike for cops in a real life). For every murder someone must be punished. No one could be absolved. If you are a cop, you will make all that is possible to bring a murderer to justice, even if it’s your partner.
    Since Tobin breaks this rule, I cannot consider him as a moral hero. That’s the problem: he’s bent cop for me now, he’s not honest.
    Donlon’s suicide and Tobin’s final arguments weaken the whole picture. Suicide is a mysterious thing in many ways, since it’s beyond out knowledge. It’s a complex thing as well, that’s why it’s always painful to hear when someone tries to analyze suicide’s motives. You never know human soul, and trying to grasp a suicide victim’s life in a few paragraphs – that’s cartoonish and childish. Parents can tell his child that his grandpa died becuase he was old, or his uncle died in a car crash. They simplify the matter for the child and his understanding of the world. They always omit nuances that cancer ate his grandpa from inside, ot that his uncle was drunk and angry when he was driving the car.
    It may be that I ask too much from a murder mystery, but the rules are the same for all, for Dostoevsky, Westlake and Ann Rice. Don’t do the crime, if you can’t do the time.

  4. I’m not quite grasping this–Donlon did the crimes, and then he voluntarily forfeited what was left of his time–you can’t punish the dead. If nobody else is going to be punished for his crimes, and nobody on the force was colluding in them, I guess I tend to agree with Tobin that the only purpose in exposing him to the world would be to crucify the department itself, for not stopping him. The police captain certainly knows Donlon is a bit off, maybe on the take, but not that he’s a murderer.

    Punishing him and others for Donlon’s crime won’t change the system–there are aspects of police culture that never change–it’s like DNA, replicating itself, and even now in the more inclusive department we have here, those same attitudes remain. Circle the wagons. Blue wall of silence. Cops feel like they can’t trust anybody but other cops. They aren’t completely wrong about that, but society has to find ways to rein them in, while still letting them do their jobs. I doubt we’ll ever get it completely right. But we can try.

    I see variations on this type of inconclusive conclusion elsewhere in the hardboiled detective genre. Farewell My Lovely ends with the murderess killing herself. How is that different? Because there were stories in the paper identifying her as a killer? If Donlon’s crimes are reported on in the papers, who suffers? Only his wife–and who would be more sensitive to that possibility than Tobin? If it’s bad enough, maybe she even loses out on the small pension she’d receive as an officer’s widow. This is justice? The man is dead. He punished himself. There’s no way to make it right. And no amount of punishment–not the electric chair, not a lifetime in maximum security–would ever bring back the dead.

    If Tobin had let him get away with it, then I’d agree–but he didn’t. You’re bothered that he didn’t get the chance to finger Donlon while Donlon was still there to finger. But Tobin doesn’t care. You don’t seem to get that about the character–he may have more of a sense of justice than Parker, but he’s still mainly opted out of the world. At least for now.

    To me, he’s more interesting by far than most detectives. It does occur to me at times to wonder if I’m really a crime fiction reader–maybe I’m a Westlake reader, reading other crime fiction just to understand him better. It’s not quite that simple, but there’s some truth in that.

    I think Westlake felt like the trap was to only tell one kind of story–he had these five stories in him, and he told them, and he was done. I think his feelings about the books were conflicted (he did jokingly kill off Tucker Coe in a humorous ‘interview’ of his many selves), but the essay he wrote about Tobin years later for some reprint editions was largely positive–he felt like he’d pulled off something different. Reviews were good, and let me just remind you–

    They still have many devoted fans–and all are now IN print, albeit electronically. They’ve stood the test of time. And as a New Yorker, I get to say that they convince me–and reach me in a way many far more touted books about my city never have.

    Btw, the rules, as far as Dostoevsky is concerned, seems to be you do the crime (namely murder), then you get exiled somewhere, and then find moral redemption, usually with an amazingly beautiful woman following you to the ends of the earth, whether that’s Siberia or (gasp!) America. Doesn’t sound so bad to me. 😉

  5. Ray

    I’m not talking about changing the system, just about owning up to what one part of this system did. Not blaming Donlon for murders means everyone think that murders of these young people remain unsolved. Donlon escaped punishment, and the only way to justice is to reveal a true identity of murderer. Donlon might be not a murderer by nature, but four people are dead.
    This system happily covers up these murders. Couldn’t it cover the murder of Tobin’s partner, then? He is also not a murderer, still he killed his partner, or his bad luck did. Police could ask Tobin to retire, without all the publicity.
    Tobin took the blame, and strangely asked to absolved Donlon.

  6. Tobin’s a strange guy–that’s kind of the point of the books. But is it really so strange that he emphasizes with the family of a dead cop (who can’t possibly be brought to justice now)–that he’d just as soon see them spared the anguish of having Donlon’s crimes dragged through the papers? Not to mention, Tobin himself would be heavily featured in those stories. In a more positive way this time–maybe he could even get reinstated. He’s beyond caring about that now.

    He just doesn’t want the attention–he wants to be left alone to build his wall. What’s the best way to be left alone to build his wall? The case remains officially unsolved. Of course, unofficially, the police know who the killer was, and won’t be looking for anyone. The families of the victims will know who was responsible–if they want, they can make a fuss about it, but seems like none of them did.

    I mean, the only thing Terry was suspected of was having sex with a black girl. The truth is, he did have an active and varied sex life. Just not with that particular girl. Robin was suspected of murdering him and the girl, but her release puts her in the clear. Clearly, she and her mother would rather the whole thing just went away, so they can recover. People who want to believe bad things about these radical Village kids will go right on believing those things no matter what they read in the papers.

    Here’s how the police culture works–Tobin was supposed to be there for his partner. He wasn’t because he was screwing an incarcerated felon’s wife. There is no way in hell they’re going to cover for that. That’s his sin against THEM–for which he will never be completely forgiven.

    What Donlon did was, of course, much worse–but it didn’t involve betraying a fellow officer–and a partner at that. It’s not a healthy outlook, but it’s a widespread one. From the POV of some cops, the only unforgivable sin a cop can commit is against a fellow cop. Or maybe molest a child–maybe. But betraying a fellow cop is worse.

    We’re supposed to see the irony–and the inconsistency. But we’re also supposed to see that Tobin is not interested in balancing out the scales of justice, or getting his own back. Far as he’s concerned, Donlon expiated his sins as much as a person possibly could by killing himself. Like I said, his suffering is over–unless there’s such a thing as hell, or purgatory. In either case, nothing written in a police file is going to make things any different for him.

    The Tobins were not written to make people feel good–they are not about pat endings (honestly, hardly anything Westlake ever wrote has a pat ending–there’s always this abruptness to his endings, a sense of “Hey, what about–? That’s it? No more story? Okay.”)

    To me, this is exactly the kind of book that made it worthwhile to do an entire blog devoted to reviewing everything Westlake ever wrote. The way he defies the audience’s preconceptions of how a story like this should go. We get so much of this now, in movies, TV, books–it’s endless. The guilty ones shall all be punished.

    Geez, I hope not. :\

  7. Small detail I forgot to mention: cops during interogation try to scare Tobin with the death penalty, for killing a cop. It seems like there were a short period in NYC history when actually only cop killers got chair, other murderers got life. Now, I believe, there is a moratorium on the death penalty in New York. Those bulls won’t have now their most powerful argument.

  8. Interesting fact–the last person to be executed in New York was in 1963, though if you watched NYC-based police procedurals on TV, you’d think it was a daily event.

    Even though it was technically brought back later, it’s never actually been used since then, except, as you say, as a bargaining chip–a threat. But I think that kind of thing leads to lazy police work, frankly. Westlake obviously thought so too, since the cops who interrogate Tobin are clearly show to be second-raters, at best. Just using brute force, instead of their brains.

    Please note, Eddie Lee Mays was a black man who killed a woman named Maria Marini (can’t find a photo, but that’s not a common name among African Americans)–that’s really what makes the difference, even more than killing a cop, to this very day–wherever the death penalty exists here, it’s going to be racist in its execution (so to speak), but then, so is incarceration.

    He was clearly deserving of his fate–and just as clearly, he was the kind of person unlikely to ever be deterred by the threat of execution. The people most likely to commit murder are the people least likely to think about consequences. The death penalty exists as an emotional escape valve for society, not as a practical method of controlling crime, or preventing violent deaths. It exists because people still believe in vengeance, but want somebody else to take responsibility for it. And while most of the western world is less backward in this respect than America, that may not always hold true in the future.

    Now regarding this novel, it’s an interesting point you raise here–the first Tobin came out in ’66, the second in ’67, but we’re not told what year it is, and not much time passes between the events of the two books. The death penalty was NOT abolished for copkillers in ’65, and it seems like they are referring to that fact when interrogating Tobin. So it’s probably ’66, or early ’67. Earliest it could be was ’65, right after Rockefeller signed the new law into effect, and it doesn’t seem to be that recent a change. Westlake doesn’t write in the past when he can help it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s